A coalition of current and former OpenAI employees has funneled more than $245,000 into a super PAC dedicated to advancing stricter artificial intelligence regulations, directly challenging a political action committee backed by the company's president and co-founder, Greg Brockman.

Guardrails Alliance, the AI safety-focused super PAC, announced Wednesday that it had received eight contributions totaling $248,000. Three of those donations were recorded in the group's quarterly Federal Election Commission filing, while the remaining five will appear in the next filing, according to the organization.

Read also
Politics
Leavitt Hints Trump Will Claim Elections Unsafe in Primetime Address
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump's Thursday speech will argue U.S. elections are not secure, pushing the SAVE America Act, as critics urge networks not to air it.

The super PAC was launched last month with the goal of supporting candidates who advocate for robust oversight of AI development ahead of the midterm elections. Guardrails Alliance frames its mission as representing parents, unions, and tech workers, aiming to “expose how a small group of Trump-aligned AI billionaires are trying to buy our elections.”

Direct Challenge to Leading the Future

Guardrails has zeroed in on Leading the Future (LTF), a super PAC formed last summer to back candidates who promote a “positive, forward-looking agenda” for AI innovation. LTF has drawn significant funding from Brockman and his wife, who personally contributed $25 million, as well as from venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, AI company Perplexity, and venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale.

Among the donors to Guardrails is Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe, a research engineer at OpenAI, who criticized Brockman for using LTF to “keep AI unregulated.” Uribe stated, “I’ve spent the past 4 years developing mitigations for the societal risks of AI at OpenAI. In this time, I’ve become concerned that all that research will have gone to waste if it doesn’t translate to guardrails that hold private companies accountable for the responsible development of AI.” He added that deciding to donate was “easy.”

Another OpenAI researcher, Gabriel Wu, who also contributed to Guardrails, expressed concern about “the massive amounts of political money being spent to ensure AI remains unregulated.”

LTF Defends Its Record

LTF has pushed back against claims that it opposes all regulation. A spokesperson for the super PAC told The Hill that the group “has laid out a clear, positive, and proactive agenda that focuses on establishing a responsible national framework on AI.” The spokesperson added, “We’re proud of our track record supporting a diverse array of policymakers and candidates across the country.”

While OpenAI and Brockman have stressed that his donation to LTF was personal, his leadership role at the company has created confusion about the firm's influence over one of the largest spending groups this election cycle. The tension mirrors broader debates in the tech industry, as seen in Apple's trade secrets suit against OpenAI, which signals a new front in the AI hardware war.

Former Insider Joins Opposition

John O’Farrell, a former general partner at LTF donor Andreessen Horowitz, also contributed to Guardrails Alliance last quarter. “But today we are seeing that ethos come under threat from a handful of the most powerful players in AI and Silicon Valley, including — to my great sadness — some of my former partners and friends,” O’Farrell said. “I’m still convinced that technology can be a powerful force for good, and AI is no different.”

He added, “But for that to happen we cannot allow hundreds of millions of dollars to be wielded to scare off any meaningful debate on the governing of AI.”

The internal rift at OpenAI underscores the high stakes of AI policy, as lawmakers and regulators grapple with how to balance innovation and safety. The employee-led push for regulation echoes concerns raised in other tech controversies, such as newspapers seeking sanctions against OpenAI over evidence in a copyright fight, highlighting the growing scrutiny of the company's practices.